[In an article titled "Hierosophy and Theosophy" which appeared in the Theosophist for
July, 1883, William Oxley, F.T.S., referred briefly to the mummification practiced by the ancient Egyptians in order to support his speculation
about "atoms" and "souls." To this passage H.P.B. appended a critical footnote. Then, in the succeeding August issue, a
correspondent, "N.D.K.," asked some questions about statements made by H.P.B. in this footnote. Here we print the July footnote,
followed by a summary of N.D.K.'s questions, and then the article of the above title, which gave H.P.B.'s replies. – Editors.
Mr. Oxley will permit us to correct him. He looks at the objective terrestrial and empty shell –
the "mummy," and forgets that there may be hidden under the crude allegory a great scientific and occult truth. We are taught that for
3,000 years at least the "mummy" notwithstanding all the chemical preparations goes on throwing off to the last invisible atoms, which
from the hour of death re-entering the various vortices of being go indeed "through every variety of organized life forms."
But it is not the soul, the 5th, least of all the 6th, principle, but the life atoms of the jiva the 2nd principle. At the end
of the 3,000 years, sometimes more, and sometimes less, after endless transmigrations all these atoms are once more drawn together, and are made
to form the new outer clothing or the body of the same monad (the real soul) which had already been clothed with two or three thousands of years
before. Even in the worst case that of the annihilation of the conscious personal principle the monad or individual soul is ever the
same as are also the atoms of the lower principles which regenerated and renewed in this ever flowing river of being are magnetically drawn
together owing to their affinity, and are once more re-incarnated together. Such was the true occult theory of the Egyptians.
[In his letter to the Editor, N.D.K. remarks that H.P.B.'s footnote constitutes "a new installment of
occult teaching" suggesting a basis of truth in the doctrine of transmigration. "What then," he asks, "is meant by the
life atoms, and their going through endless transmigrations?" Also, do "both the invisible atoms of the Jiva after going
through various life-atoms return again to re-form the physical body, and the Jiva of the entity that has reached the end of its Devachanic
state and is ready to be re-incarnated again?" Further, "does the term 'lower principles' include the 'Kama rupa' also, or only the
lower triad of body, Jiva, and Linga sarira?" Finally, "do the atoms of the 4th principle (Kama rupa) and lower portion of the 5th,
which cannot be assimilated by the 6th . . . also re-form – after going through various transmigrations, to constitute over again the 4th and
lower 5th of the next incarnation?"
We would, to begin with, draw our correspondent's attention to the closing sentence of the foot-note under
his review. "Such was the true occult theory of the Egyptians" – the word "true" being used there in the sense of its being
the doctrine they really believed in, as distinct from both the tenets fathered upon them by some Orientalists and quoted by Mr. Oxley, and that
which the modern occultists may be now teaching. It does not stand to reason that, outside those occult truths that were known to, and revealed
by, the great Hierophants during the final initiation, we should accept all that either the Egyptians or any other people may have
regarded as true. The Priests of Isis were the only true initiates, and their occult teachings were still more veiled than those of the
Chaldeans. There was the true doctrine of the Hierophants of the inner Temple; then the half-veiled Hieratic tenets of the Priest of the
outer Temple; and finally, the vulgar popular religion of the great body of the ignorant who were allowed to reverence animals as
divine. As shown correctly by Sir Gardner Wilkinson, the initiated priests taught that – "dissolution is only the cause of reproduction . .
. nothing perishes which has once existed, but things which appear to be destroyed only change their natures and pass into another form." In
the present case, however, the Egyptian doctrine of atoms coincides with our own occult teachings.
The just criticism of our observing brother, who takes naturally enough the sentence – "The life-atoms
of the Jiva" in its literal sense, reminds us at the same time, more than ever, of that most important fact that one can never take too much
care to express clearly new ideas while writing on metaphysical subjects. In penning the words under review, no thought was given in fact, that
the idea was "a new installment," and, therefore, its incompleteness gave rise to a fresh misunderstanding. Without any doubt
Jiva or Prana is quite distinct from the atoms it animates. The latter belong to the lowest or grossest state of matter – the
objectively conditioned; the former – to its highest state: that state which the uninitiated, ignorant of its nature, would call the "objectively finite," but which, to avoid any future misunderstanding, we may, perhaps, be permitted to
call the Subjectively Eternal, though at the same time, and in one sense the subsistent existence – however paradoxical and unscientific
the term may appear.1
Life, the occultist says, is the eterna1 uncreated energy, and it alone represents in the infinite universe,
that which the physicists have agreed to name the principle? or the law of continuity, though they apply it only
to the endless development of the conditioned. But since modern science admits through her most learned professors that "energy has as much
claim to be regarded as an objective reality as matter itself,"2 and that life, according to the occult doctrine, –
is the one energy acting Proteus-like under the most varied forms, the occultists have a certain right to use such a phraseology. Life
is ever present in the atom or matter, whether organic or inorganic, conditioned or unconditioned – a difference that the occultists do not
accept. Their doctrine is that life is as much present in the inorganic as in the organic matter: when life-energy is active in the atom, that
atom is organic; when dormant or latent, then the atom is inorganic. Therefore, the expression "life-atom" though apt in one sense to
mislead the reader, is not incorrect after all, since occultists do not recognise that anything in nature can be inorganic and know of no
"dead atoms," whatever meaning science may give to the adjective.
The alleged law of Biogenesis is the result of the ignorance of the man of science of
occult physics. It is accepted because the man of science was hitherto unable to find the necessary means to awaken into activity
dormant life in what he terms an inorganic atom: hence the fallacy that a living thing can only be produced from a living thing, as though there
ever was such a thing as dead matter in Nature! At this rate, and to be consistent, a mule ought to be also classed with inorganic
matter, since it is unable to reproduce itself, and generate life.
We lay so much stress upon the above to answer at once any future objection to the idea that a mummy several
thousand years old, can be throwing off atoms. Nevertheless the sentence may perhaps have been more clearly expressed by saying instead of the "life-atoms of Jiva," the atoms "animated by dormant Jiva or life energy." Again, the sentence
quoted by our correspondent from Fragment No. 1,* though quite correct on the whole, might be more fully, if not more
clearly, expressed. The "Jiva," or life principle which animates man, beast, plant or even a mineral, certainly is "a form of
force, indestructible," since this force is the one life, or anima mundi, the universal living soul, and that the various modes in
which the various objective things appear to us in nature in their atomic aggregations, such as minerals, plants, animals, etc., are all the
different forms or states in which this force manifests itself. Were it to become, we will not say absent, for this is impossible, since it is
omnipresent, but for one single instant inactive, say in a stone, the particles of the latter would lose instantly their cohesive property and
disintegrate as suddenly – though the force would still remain in each of its particles, but in a dormant state. Thus the continuation of the
sentence which states that, when this indestructible force is "disconnected with one set of atoms, it becomes attracted immediately by
others" does not imply that it abandons entirely the first set, but only that it transfers its vis viva or living power,
the energy of motion, to another set. But because it manifests itself in the next set as what is called Kinetic
energy, it does not follow that the first set is deprived of it altogether; for it is still in it, as potential energy, or life
latent.3 This is a cardinal and basic truth of occultism, on the perfect knowledge of which depends the production of
every phenomenon. Unless we admit this point, we should have to give up all the other truths of occultism. Thus what is "meant by the
life-atom going through endless transmigration" is simply this: we regard and call in our occult phraseology those atoms that are moved by
Kinetic energy as "life-atoms," while those that are for the time being passive, containing but invisible potential energy, we
call "sleeping atoms," regarding at the same time those two forms of energy as produced by the one and same force, or life. We have to
beg our readers' indulgence: we are neither a man of science, nor an English scholar. Forced by circumstances to give out the little we know, we
do the best we can and explain matters to the best of our ability. Ignorant of Newton's laws, we claim to know something only of the
Occult Laws of motion. And now to the Hindu doctrine of Metempsychosis.
It has a basis of truth; and, in fact, it is an axiomatic truth – but only in reference to human atoms and
emanations, and that not only after a man's death, but during the whole period of his life. The esoteric meaning of the Laws of Manu (Sec. XII,
3, and XII, 54 and 55), of the verses that state that "every act, either mental, verbal or corporeal, bears good or evil fruit (Karma), the
various transmigrations of men (not souls) through the highest, middle, and lowest stages, are produced by his actions"; and again
that "A Brahman-killer enters the body of a dog, bear, ass, camel, goat, sheep, bird, etc.," bears no reference to the human Ego, but
only to the atoms of his body, of his lower triad, and his fluidic emanations.
It is all very well for the Brahmins to distort in their own interest, the real meaning contained in these
laws, but the words as quoted never meant what they were made to yield from the above verses later on. The Brahmins applied them selfishly to
themselves, whereas by "Brahman," man's seventh principle, his immortal monad and the essence of the personal Ego were allegorically
meant. He who kills or extinguishes in himself the light of Parabrahm, i.e., severs his personal Ego from the Atman and thus kills the
future Devachanee, becomes a "Brahman-killer." Instead of facilitating, through a virtuous life and spiritual aspirations the mutual
union of the Buddhi and the Manas, he condemns by his own evil acts every atom of his lower principles to become attracted and
drawn, in virtue of the magnetic affinity thus created by his passions, into the forming bodies of lower animals or brutes. This is the real
meaning of the doctrine of Metempsychosis. It is not that such amalgamation of human particles with animal or even vegetable atoms can carry in
it any idea of personal punishment per se, for of course it does not. But it is a cause created, the effects of which may manifest
themselves throughout the next rebirths – unless the personality is annihilated. Otherwise, from cause to effect, every effect becoming in its
turn a cause, they will run along the cycle of rebirths, the once-given impulse expending itself only at the threshold of Pralaya. But of this
Notwithstanding their esoteric meaning, even the words of the grandest and noblest of all the adepts,
Gautama Buddha, are misunderstood, distorted and ridiculed in the same way. The Hina-yana, the lowest form of transmigration of the
Buddhist, is as little comprehended as the Maha-yana, its highest form, and, because Sakya Muni is shown to have once remarked to his
Bhikkus, while pointing out to them a broom, that "it had formerly been a novice who neglected to sweep out" the Council room, hence
was reborn as a broom (!), therefore, the wisest of all of the world's sages stands accused of idiotic superstition. Why not try and find out,
before accusing, the true meaning of the figurative statement? Why should we scoff before we understand?
Is or is not that which is called magnetic effluvia a something, a stuff, or substance, invisible, and
imponderable though it be? If the learned authors of "The Unseen Universe" object to light, heat and electricity being regarded merely
as imponderables, and show that each of these phenomena has as much claim to be recognized as an objective reality as matter itself – our right
to regard the mesmeric or magnetic fluid which emanates from man to man or even from man to what is termed an inanimate object, is far
greater. It is not enough to say that this fluid is a species of molecular energy like heat, for instance, for it is vastly more. Heat is
produced whenever visible energy is transformed into molecular energy, we are told, and it may be thrown out by any material composed of sleeping
atoms or inorganic matter as it is called: whereas the magnetic fluid projected by a living human body is life itself. "Indeed it
is life-atoms" that a man in a blind passion throws off, unconsciously, and though he does it quite as effectively as a mesmeriser who
transfers them from himself to any object consciously and under the guidance of his will. Let any man give way to any intense feeling, such as
anger, grief, etc., under or near a tree, or in direct contact with a stone; and many thousands of years after that any tolerable Psychometer
will see the man and sense his feelings, from one single fragment of that tree or stone that he had touched. Hold any object in your hand, and it
will become impregnated with your life atoms, indrawn and outdrawn, changed and transferred in us at every instant of our lives. Animal heat is
but so many life atoms in molecular motion. It requires no adept knowledge, but simply the natural gift of a good clairvoyant subject to see them
passing to and fro, from man to objects and vice versa like a bluish lambent flame.
Why then should not a broom, made of a shrub, which grew most likely in the vicinity of the building where
the lazy novice lived, a shrub, perhaps, repeatedly touched by him while in a state of anger, provoked by his laziness and distaste to his duty,
– why should not a quantity of his life atoms have passed into the materials of the future besom and therein have been recognised by Buddha,
owing to his superhuman (not supernatural) powers? The processes of nature are acts of incessant borrowing and giving back. The
materialistic sceptic, however, will not take anything in any, save in a literal, dead-letter sense. We would invite those Christian Orientalists
who chuckle at this record of Buddha's teachings to compare it with a certain passage in the Gospels – a teaching of Christ. To his disciples'
query "who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" – the answer they received was – "neither hath this man
sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him." (John ix. 2-3.)
Now Gautama's statement has a scientific and philosophic meaning for every
occultist at least, if it lacks a clear meaning for the profane; while the answer put (probably centuries later4) into
the mouth of the founder of Christianity by his over-zealous and ignorant biographers has not even that esoteric meaning, which so many of the
sayings of Jesus are pregnant with. This alleged teaching is an uncalled-for and blasphemous insult to their own God, implying, as it clearly
does, that for the pleasure of manifesting his power, the Deity had foredoomed an innocent man to the torture of a life-long blindness. As well
accuse Christ of being the author of the 39 Articles!
To conclude our too long answer, the "lower principles" mentioned in the foot-note are – the 1st,
2nd and 3rd. They cannot include the Kamarupa, for this "rupa" belongs to the middle, not the lower principles. And, to our
correspondent's further query, "do the atoms of these (the 4th and the 5th) also re-form after going through various transmigrations to
constitute over again the 4th and the lower 5th of the next incarnation" – we answer – "they do." The reason why we have tried to
explain the doctrine of the "life atoms" at such length, is precisely in connection with this last question, and with the object of
throwing out one more valuable hint. We do not feel at liberty at present, however, to give any further details.
Theosophist, July, August, 1883
H. P. Blavatsky
1 Though there is a distinct term for it in the language of the adepts, how can one translate it into a European
language? What name can be given to that which is objective yet immaterial in its finite manifestations, subjective
yet substantive (though not in our sense of substance) in its eternal existence? Haring explained it the best we can, we leave
the task of finding a more appropriate term for it to our learned English occultists. – Ed.
back to text
2 Unseen Universe.
* From "Fragments of Occult Truth – I" (Theosophist III, 18;
see THEOSOPHY 2:100). The full sentence reads: "The Vital principle (or Jiv-atma), a form of
force, indestructible, and when disconnected with one set of atoms, becoming attracted immediately by others."
3 We fell constrained to make use of terms that have become technical in modern
science – though they do not always fully express the idea to be conveyed – for want of better words. It is useless to hope that the occult
doctrine may be ever thoroughly understood – even the few tenets that can be safely given to the world at large – unless a glossary of such words
is edited; and, what is of a still more primary importance – until the full and correct meaning of the terms therein taught is thoroughly
mastered. – Ed.
back to text
4 And probably by, or under, the inspiration of Irenæus – since the
sentence is found in the 4th Gospel, that of John, that did not exist yet at the time of his quarrels with the
back to text